<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Three Wise Men &#187; Photography</title> <atom:link href="http://www.twm-kd.com/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.twm-kd.com</link> <description>In desperate need of a punchline.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>DSLR vs. Compact</title><link>http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/dslr-vs-compact/</link> <comments>http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/dslr-vs-compact/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:44:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digital single-lens reflex camera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Equipment and Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Point-and-shoot camera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wide-angle lens]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.twm-kd.com/?p=669</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been almost too long since my last post but anyway, I think it&#8217;s just the right time. In my previous post I was writing (ranting) about digital revolution which is also an important part in this post. One of the questions is when should an amateur switch from a compact camera to a DSLR? [...]<hr
/><div
class='related-posts'><h5>Related Posts:</h5><ol><li><a
href=' http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/digital-revolution/' rel='bookmark'>Digital Revolution</a></li></ol></div>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been almost too long since <a
href="http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/digital-revolution/">my last post</a> but anyway, I think it&#8217;s just the right time. In my previous post I was writing (ranting) about digital revolution which is also an important part in this post.</p><p>One of the questions is when should an amateur switch from a <a
class="zem_slink" title="Point-and-shoot camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-and-shoot_camera">compact camera</a> to a <a
class="zem_slink" title="Digital single-lens reflex camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_single-lens_reflex_camera">DSLR</a>? Does someone who decided to become a so called &#8220;<em>photographer</em>&#8221; even wants to buy a compact? First I think I&#8217;ll have to clarify that by a compact I don&#8217;t mean <em>put it in your pocket compact</em> but very a bit more serious Canon <a
href="http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_Camera/PowerShot/PowerShot_G10/index.asp">Powershot G10</a> or <a
href="http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_Camera/PowerShot/PowerShot_SX10_IS/index.asp">SX10 IS</a>.</p><p>Read more, to find out more &#8230; ;)</p><p><span
id="more-669"></span></p><p>I don&#8217;t know where to start. So, first let&#8217;s have a look at this from a financial point of view. A cheap DSLR with a <a
class="zem_slink" title="Kit lens" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kit_lens">kit lens</a> will costs around 500€. On the other hand a little bit advanced and more expensive compact will cost around 450€, usually supplied with a memory card, batteries, charger, etc &#8230; Pictures that those two produce are at some point virtually indistinguishable and you can&#8217;t really tell which camera was the one making the picture. With an advanced compact you&#8217;ll get built in flash, manual control and a lot of other stuff that DSLRs have. You&#8217;ll also get a universal lens with focal points anywhere from 18mm and up to almost 400mm. Cheapest DSLRs will come with kit 18-55mm lens which can be very disappointing especially if you find that out while you want to take a picture of a duck in the middle of a stream and you just can&#8217;t zoom on it.</p><p>However, with compact you&#8217;ll also get a relatively slow auto-focus. Pop-up flash that cannot be upgraded and is almost useless for any serious work, you&#8217;ll also get a very small <a
class="zem_slink" title="Charge-coupled device" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device">CCD</a> or CMOS sensor which will contribute to increased noise at higher ISO settings. You&#8217;re also stuck with one and the same lens until your compact simply breaks and stops working, then you can go and buy a new one.</p><p>So which one is better? If you&#8217;re looking for something that you can throw in your backpack and you don&#8217;t want an extra backpack or bag to carry around with you, then go for compact. Otherwise DSLR without a doubt. Which one will make better pictures? Hard to say, I want to say DSLR but it really depends a lot on the photographer and the conditions you&#8217;re shooting in.</p><p>Let&#8217;s wrap up with some pros and cons for both.</p><p><strong>Cheap DSLR</strong></p><p><strong>Pros:</strong></p><ul><li>It is DSLR, that&#8217;s always a pro ;)</li><li>Many, many lenses that you can use and switch between them whenever you like</li><li>Bigger sensor, less noise and in the end better picture quality in not-so-perfect conditions</li><li>Longer battery life, more than thousand pictures with one battery charge is not uncommon</li><li>See-Thru-Lens viewfinder which works in all light conditions</li></ul><p><strong>Cons</strong></p><ul><li>Kit lens are usually not enough and you&#8217;ll have to buy more</li><li>It seems that you get less for more money: no <a
class="zem_slink" title="Wide-angle lens" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide-angle_lens">wide angle lens</a>, no <a
class="zem_slink" title="Telephoto lens" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephoto_lens">telephoto lens</a>, no <a
class="zem_slink" title="Macro photography" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_photography">macro lens</a></li><li>Heavy and bulky, an extra bag or backpack is required to carry all the stuff around</li><li>It comes with a price in the long run, much higher price</li></ul><p><strong>Expensive compact</strong></p><p><strong>Pros</strong></p><ul><li>A lot of zoom, from 18mm to 400mm, taking macro shots, wide angle shots and telephoto shots</li><li>A lot of megapixels ;) which always sounds better</li><li>Live view, seeing is believing, right?</li><li>De-attachable <a
class="zem_slink" title="Liquid crystal display" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display">LCD screen</a> that can be twisted and turned in many ways and it really minimizes the chances that you&#8217;ll gave to lay down on the ground and sprain your neck while taking a picture</li><li>Recording movies, picture is worth a thousand words, so movie must be worth thousands of words and if you get tired of taking still pictures you can start making movies</li><li>If you&#8217;re happy with the results it is cheaper in the long run</li></ul><p><strong>Cons</strong></p><ul><li>It is not DSLR and you won&#8217;t look such a <em>badass</em> with your camera in public</li><li>Only one lens that you&#8217;re stuck with for the rest of its lifetime</li><li>Quickly degrading quality when conditions are worse than perfect</li><li>Limited room for expansion</li></ul><p>This is the part where I say don&#8217;t rush it. If you want get in <a
class="zem_slink" title="Photography" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography">photography</a> more seriously it will take a longer time and will cost you more. With a good compact your options never really close, you can always buy something better. If you&#8217;re not sure if photography is your thing, then try with compact first. If you&#8217;re already sure and determined to dive into photography, go with DSLR. But keep in mind that it&#8217;s good to have at least 3 lenses (macro, wide, telephoto) and that kit lens are mediocre quality and you&#8217;ll strive for bigger and better and more expensive. In the end your lenses can cost ten times more than your camera.</p><p>I started with a compact and I was striving for more, when I reached the point and I was sure that I got the most out of the camera, then and only then I decidet to buy a new one. At that time it was one of the best compacts available on the market. A friendly advice: it will be easier to sell good compact than cheap DSLR, I sold mine in a short time and got a decent price for it.</p><h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6><ul
class="zemanta-article-ul"><li
class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a
href="http://jwebb.ca/blog/2009/05/06/why-you-shouldnt-buy-a-dslr/"> Why you shouldn&#8217;t buy a DSLR </a> (jwebb.ca)</li><li
class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a
href="http://gizmodo.com/5257816/sonys-new-entry+level-dslrs-officially-confirmed"> Sony&#8217;s New Entry-Level DSLRs Officially Confirmed [DSLRs] </a> (gizmodo.com)</li><li
class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a
href="http://www.geeksugar.com/3031836"> Do You Have an SLR? </a> (geeksugar.com)</li><li
class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a
href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/canon-puts-more-power-in-its-powershot/%3Fpartner%3Drss%26emc%3Drss&amp;a=3330342&amp;rid=eeb0aebb-5039-41a2-9df8-aedd4a62cdc2&amp;e=659455c3d09ebbe89103b1e0859d3192">Gadgetwise: Canon Puts More Power in Its PowerShot</a> (gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com)</li><li
class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a
href="http://www.livedigitally.com/2009/05/22/essential-comparison-chart-for-canon-point-and-shoot-cameras/"> Essential Comparison Chart for Canon Point-and-Shoot Cameras </a> (livedigitally.com)</li></ul><div
class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a
class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/eeb0aebb-5039-41a2-9df8-aedd4a62cdc2/"><img
class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=eeb0aebb-5039-41a2-9df8-aedd4a62cdc2" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span
class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div> <br
/><hr
/><div
class='related-posts'><h5>Related Posts:</h5><ol><li><a
href=' http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/digital-revolution/' rel='bookmark'>Digital Revolution</a></li></ol></div>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/dslr-vs-compact/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Digital Revolution</title><link>http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/digital-revolution/</link> <comments>http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/digital-revolution/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:20:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digital photography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Digital single-lens reflex camera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photograph]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.twm-kd.com/?p=41</guid> <description><![CDATA[I am what you could call an amateur photographer and in my opinion a noob. So why listen to me? Because there are amateurs out there that are worse then me and so called professionals that suck even more. Digital photography, has been available to masses for nearly two decades and from the very beginning [...]<hr
/><div
class='related-posts'><h5>Related Posts:</h5><ol><li><a
href=' http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/dslr-vs-compact/' rel='bookmark'>DSLR vs. Compact</a></li></ol></div>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am what you could call an amateur photographer and in my opinion a noob. So why listen to me? Because there are amateurs out there that are worse then me and so called professionals that suck even more.</p><p><a
class="zem_slink" title="Digital photography" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_photography">Digital photography</a>, has been available to masses for nearly two decades and from the very beginning it started to revolutionize the world  of <a
class="zem_slink" title="Photography" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography">photography</a> that was created in the early <a
class="zem_slink" title="19th century" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th_century">19th century</a>.</p><p>But did we gain anything with it? Yes we did, thanks to digital photography any intellectually challenged person with 300€ can buy a surprisingly good <a
class="zem_slink" title="Camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camera">camera</a> and transform into a <em>photographer</em>.  And not just that a lot of emotionally troubled people are also a reborn &#8220;artists&#8221; that are flooding every online gallery and forum with &#8220;dark&#8221; images describing their <em>troubled </em>childhood, inner fears, &#8230; etc. Also we have professionals and semi-professionals with equipment worth 5000€ on a payroll for their artwork that could not pass as a snapshot from a 5 year-old without some serious <em>photoshop work</em>.</p><p>Is that the downside, and the upside? Thanks to everyone mentioned above the prices of cameras and lenses have dropped significantly and that for me is worth mentioning. Of course among the thousands we also have a couple who are actually good at what they do and are willing to learn even more.</p><p>Digital photography also simplified the developing process. What usually took hours or days and had to be done by a professional in a studio is now possible within minutes by anyone with some basic (sometimes even without) computer and camera skills. Plug and play applications and devices have made possible for people to download or <a
class="zem_slink" title="Photograph" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photograph">print</a> standard format pictures just by pressing a button or two.</p><p>So whats next? Its hard to say, but we can say that compact cameras will get smaller, easier to use, photo editing  software will be simplifed, &#8230; etc. <a
class="zem_slink" title="Digital single-lens reflex camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_single-lens_reflex_camera">DSLR</a> are cheaper everyday and &#8230; well more about that next time.</p><div
class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a
class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/8aaf6481-8dc8-4935-828f-ba8c24d2c16d/"><img
class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8aaf6481-8dc8-4935-828f-ba8c24d2c16d" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span
class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div> <br
/><hr
/><div
class='related-posts'><h5>Related Posts:</h5><ol><li><a
href=' http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/dslr-vs-compact/' rel='bookmark'>DSLR vs. Compact</a></li></ol></div>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.twm-kd.com/photography/digital-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
